Sunday, February 13, 2011

Media Falsely Labeled the Lashing death of Hena as a Sharia Ruling to defame Islam -by Irshad Alam

Courtesy : Facebook

Irshad Alam
Sunday, February 13, 2011 at 10:25am

While I am saddened by the judgment of the kangaroo court, and the death of the girl Hena, I also want to point out the lies against Islam that BBC is making.

BBC lies:

1. if u read the report, you'll see that it mentions one single village elder who was also a low-level Muslim cleric. Then that suddenly becomes "muslim clerics" a plural --- it shows that they're intentionally trying to make it an islamic verdict.

2. a Fatawa is the Muslim analogue of a Rabbanical court ruling. the BBC report says that it was a "religious ruling" and that's a lie. if its a Rabbanical ruling, all the judges will be rabbis, right? the same here, if it were a Fatawa, all the judges will be qualified MUFTIs. in this case none were muftis, although one was indeed a low-level cleric.

3. now its true that the word Fatawa has another meaning except the religious ruling, it is also a decision by a village kangaroo court and that's what the Bangladesh courts have made illegal. BBC should know better, so why r they confusing this?

===0===

Excerpts from Comments:-

John Patrick Mijac
..The media are a circus of acts created to excite and entrance the public, you should ignore them...


Kazi Azizul Huq
We would like to know from the reporter:

Names, Designations and qualifications of the Members of the Village Council referred in the report. Usually rural leaders are local government members or village leaders who have no religious education.

If one or group of qualified Mufti (s) or a recognized Darul Ifta has Issued Fatwa, only then it may be considered that the decision was made under Islamic Shariah. If there is any injustice or misuse or excess, then the matter may be referred to more qualified Mufti(s) or Dariul Ifta.


Sohel Nadeem Rahman
As someone intimately familiar with the case and such cases, there is a religious component to such widespread atrocities in Bangladesh. To deny that is a shameful denial of the truth.

That being said, that "religious" component is an evil perversion of religion and most people in this country (Bangladesh) know that in their hearts. Organizations like BBC have the responsibility, in light of journalistic fairness and integrity AND intellectual honesty, to do better and need to discern rather than conflate religion and human crime and error in the name of religion. In fact, as Irshad Bhai suggested here, they also need to qualitatively differentiate the type of courts and cleric (s) involved on a case by case basic.

Let us also stay equally focused on the evil that bury Henas every day here and elsewhere.


Irshad Alam  
u may ask the reporter in BBC ethirajan.anbarasan@bbc.co.uk

David Rosser-Owen
‎.. "Organizations like BBC have the responsibility, in light of journalistic fairness and integrity AND intellectual honesty, to do better and need to discern rather than conflate religion and human crime and error in the name of religion". While this ought to be the case, and the profession of journalism as described by John Delane in the 1850s and as personified by such as Ed Murrow in the 1940s held it to be so, print and broadcast media have long abandoned this code in favour of becoming government stenographers and peddlars of corporate propaganda. Currently the target is Islam and Muslims. I wouldn't expect the truth from these "public writers", nor would I think that any of them will any time soon rediscover their duty to "educate and inform". Occasionally, a pet will be allowed to write or say something, but then it'll be buried under a welter of propaganda and soon forgotten.

 Irshad Alam  
The US annual Report on International Religious Freedom last year said although Islamic tradition dictates that only 'muftis' or religious scholars were authorized to declare a fatwa, village religious leaders at times made declarations in individual cases.--- so you know that, why call these declarations Fatawa or islamic justice, when they dont even make such claim? this is only to belittle islam.

David Rosser-Owen
Sohel - I think that none of the state or corporate owned media is living up to the profession of journalism. I would be delighted to be proved wrong. There are occasional survivals of the true journalist among the corporate media, such as Gideon Levy, Eric Margolis, Pepe Escobar, Helen Thomas, but most others aren't. Nearly all of the real journalists are nowadays to be found in the 'alternative media' (or what Mike Rivero calls "the citizen media") that is to be found on the Internet. In this environment one will find such radio podcasts as those of Mark Glenn or Kevin Barrett, newssites like Mike Rivero's (whatreallyhappened.com) or Rixon Stewart's (thetruthseeker.co.uk), or blogs like Mantiq Al Tayr (mantiqaltayr.wordpress.com) and Desert Peace (desertpeace.wordpress.com). These are the heirs to John Delane and Ed Murrow.

 
Meir Stone Did Clerics in her region condem the flogging ? Are the people who had her Ffloged going to be charged with a crime ?
 
Irshad Alam
yes the people who flogged her r indeed being charged. they r now in jail, in interrogation or r fugitives.

many muslim groups have indeed spoken out. village clerics r quite uneducated and they dont make newspaper statements like US clerics... do. anyway it was not a decision by clerics nor was it an islamic sharia justice. pls read the above. though i know of many clerics who decry such village arbitrations.


Meir Stone  
Thanks Irshad ...Remember if we see an evil we must stop it if we can! If we can't Stop it speak out ! or at lest heat it with all your heart Shalom , Salaam and Peace

===0=== 

Honest British Reporting on this incident
This killing has nothing to do with Sharia or Islam
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/03/bangladeshi-girl-100-lashes

Bangladeshi girl, 14, dies after receiving 100 lashes

Four arrested and another 14 hunted by police, accused of taking part in lashing ordered by village court

Fariha Karim in Dhaka 
Thursday 3 February 2011 19.54 GMT



Four people have been arrested in Bangladesh after the death of a 14-year-old girl who was given 100 lashes on the orders of a village cleric.

Mosammet Hena died in hospital on Sunday after being beaten with a bamboo cane for allegedly having an illicit relationship with a married cousin. A complaint had been made against her by the man's wife, Shilpi Begum, at a makeshift village court, or shalish, presided over by senior community members.

Shilpi has now been arrested on suspicion of murder alongside three villagers including imam Mofiz Uddin, who allegedly issued the edict. Another 14 villagers who are accused of taking part in the public lashing, or of being complicit in the girl's murder by failing to prevent her from being whipped, are still being hunted by police.

"What sort of justice is this? My daughter has been beaten to death in the name of justice," Mosammet's father, Dorbesh Khan, 60, told the BBC.

Mosammet was buried yesterday in her family graveyard in Naria, Shariatpur, about 40 miles south of the capital, Dhaka.

Police said Shilpi told the shalish she had seen Mosammet speaking to her husband, Mahbub, 40, near their home. The shalish ruled that Mosammet and Mahbub should each be flogged 100 times, according to Assistant Superintendent Talebur Rahman. Mosammet was dragged inside a house by about 20 to 25 people, including four women. She collapsed unconscious halfway through and was taken to hospital, where she died a week later. Mahbub, who was beaten by his father, is said by police to be on the run.

The case has sent shockwaves around Bangladesh, where punishments in the name of fatwa – a religious edict – have been outlawed since last year. Authorities were ordered by the high court to act to stop punishments, and told that a failure to do so breached their constitutional duties.

Since Mosammet's death lawyers have filed a case against the government at the court, and a team of investigators from a human rights organisation has travelled to the village. Its director of investigations, Nur Khan Liton, said: "This is an absolutely horrific crime. It shows that despite court judgments banning punishments in the name of fatwa, an aggressively religious group who are capable of committing such barbaric crimes of torture against women are still present in our society."

Local media have reported that Mosammet was raped by Mahbub and Shilpi heard her cries, then came out and began beating her. Police do not accept this.

• This article was amended on 4 February 2011. The original gave the name of one of the arrested as Shilpi Begum, and Begum thereafter. In Bangladesh, Begum is a title that is roughly equivalent to Mrs and so should not have been mistaken as the woman's surname. This has been corrected.
===0=== 

BBC Reporting
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12344959


Four arrested after Bangladesh girl 'lashed to death'



Four people including a Muslim cleric have been arrested in Bangladesh in connection with the death of 14-year-old girl who was publicly lashed.

The teenager was accused of having an affair with a married man, police say, and the punishment was given under Islamic Sharia law.

Hena Begum's family members said a village court consisting of elders and clerics passed the sentence.
She was alleged to have had the affair with her cousin and received 80 lashes.
Punishment received
 
The family members of the married man also allegedly beat the girl up a day before the village court passed the sentence in the district of Shariatpur.

Hena Begum  
Hena Begum died after being taken to hospital
 
"Her family members said she was admitted to a hospital after the incident and she died six days later. The village elders also asked the girl's father to pay a fine of about 50,000 Taka (£430; $700)," district superintendent of police, AKM Shahidur Rahman, told the BBC.

He said it had not been established yet whether she died because of the punishment she received or another reason.

"We are still waiting for the post-mortem report. In the meantime, we are also looking for another 14 people including a teacher from a local madrassa in connection with this case," Mr Rahman said.

Activists say dozens of fatwas - or religious rulings - are issued under Sharia law each year by village clergy in Bangladesh.

"What sort of justice is this? My daughter has been beaten to death in the name of justice. If it had been a proper court then my daughter would not have died," Dorbesh Khan, the father of Hena Begum, told the BBC.

He said those responsible for the death should be punished.

A group of people held a rally on Wednesday in the town of Shariatpur in protest against those who gave the fatwa and demanded action against them.

This is the second reported fatality linked to a Sharia law punishment since the practice was outlawed last year by the High Court.

A 40-year-old woman in the district of Rajshahi died in December, days after she was publicly caned for allegedly having an affair with her stepson.

Nearly 90% of Bangladesh's estimated 160 million population are Muslims, most of whom practise a moderate version of Islam.

Friday, February 11, 2011

* Comment is free Egypt's joy as Mubarak quits -Tariq Ali, guardian.co.uk

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/feb/11/egypt-cairo-hosni-mubarak
Egypt's turning point: Anti-government protesters in Tahrir square. Photograph: Andre Pain/EPA
Friday 11 February 2011 16.32 GMT


A joyous night in Cairo. What bliss to be alive, to be an Egyptian and an Arab. In Tahrir Square they're chanting, "Egypt is free" and "We won!"

The removal of Mubarak alone (and getting the bulk of his $40bn loot back for the national treasury), without any other reforms, would itself be experienced in the region and in Egypt as a huge political triumph. It will set new forces into motion. A nation that has witnessed miracles of mass mobilisations and a huge rise in popular political consciousness will not be easy to crush, as Tunisia demonstrates.

Arab history, despite appearances, is not static. Soon after the Israeli victory of 1967 that marked the defeat of secular Arab nationalism, one of the great Arab poets, Nizar Qabbani wrote:
Arab children,
Corn ears of the future,
You will break our chains.
Kill the opium in our heads,
Kill the illusions.
Arab children,
Don't read about our suffocated generation,
We are a hopeless case,
As worthless as a water-melon rind.
Don't read about us,
Don't ape us,
Don't accept us,
Don't accept our ideas,
We are a nation of crooks and jugglers.
Arab children,
Spring rain,
Corn ears of the future,
You are the generation that will overcome defeat.
How happy he would have been to seen his prophecy being fulfilled.

The new wave of mass opposition has happened at a time where there are no radical nationalist parties in the Arab world, and this has dictated the tactics: huge assemblies in symbolic spaces posing an immediate challenge to authority – as if to say, we are showing our strength, we don't want to test it because we neither organised for that nor are we prepared, but if you mow us down remember the world is watching.

Egypt's vice president Suleiman makes the announcement that Hosni Mubarak has stepped down Egypt's vice president Omar Suleiman makes the announcement that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has stepped down Photograph: AP 
 

This dependence on global public opinion is moving, but is also a sign of weakness. Had Obama and the Pentagon ordered the Egyptian army to clear the square – however high the cost – the generals would have obeyed orders, but it would have been an extremely risky operation for them, if not for Obama. It could have split the high command from ordinary soldiers and junior officers, many of whose relatives and families are demonstrating and many of whom know and feel that the masses are on the right side. That would have meant a revolutionary upheaval of a sort that neither Washington nor the Muslim Brotherhood – the party of cold calculation – desired.
The show of popular strength was enough to get rid of the current dictator. He'd only go if the US decided to take him away. After much wobbling, they did. They had no other serious option left. The victory, however, belongs to the Egyptian people whose unending courage and sacrifices made all this possible.

And so it ended badly for Mubarak and his old henchman. Having unleashed security thugs only a fortnight ago, Vice-President Suleiman's failure to dislodge the demonstrators from the square was one more nail in the coffin. The rising tide of the Egyptian masses with workers coming out on strike , judges demonstrating on the streets, and the threat of even larger crowds next week, made it impossible for Washington to hang on to Mubarak and his cronies. The man Hillary Clinton had referred to as a loyal friend, indeed "family", was dumped. The US decided to cut its losses and authorised the military intervention.

Omar Suleiman, an old western favourite, was selected as vice-president by Washington, endorsed by the EU, to supervise an "orderly transition". Suleiman was always viewed by the people as a brutal and corrupt torturer, a man who not only gives orders, but participates in the process. A WikiLeaks document had a former US ambassador praising him for not being "squeamish". The new vice president had warned the protesting crowds last Tuesday that if they did not demobilise themselves voluntarily, the army was standing by: a coup might be the only option left. It was, but against the dictator they had backed for 30 years. It was the only way to stabilise the country. There could be no return to "normality".

The age of political reason is returning to the Arab world. The people are fed up of being colonised and bullied. Meanwhile, the political temperature is rising in Jordan, Algeria and Yemen.

Amnesty International on UK-trained security force RAB

http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/uk-trained-security-forces-must-stop-extrajudicial-executions-bangladesh-20

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
PRESS RELEASE

27 January 2011


UK-trained security forces must stop extrajudicial executions in Bangladesh

Amnesty International is calling on the UK government to raise concerns about reports of torture, extrajudicial executions, and excessive use of force by the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB) with the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina.

Sheikh Hasina is in the United Kingdom this week amid a flurry of accusations about extrajudicial executions carried out by Bangladeshi security forces.

Amnesty International and other human rights organisations have documented repeated instances of human rights violations by the RAB in the past five years. More than 600 people are thought to have been killed by RAB personnel since 2004 when the battalion was created.

In most cases, victims have died in the custody of the RAB, but police authorities routinely reported that the victims were killed during "crossfire", police "shoot-outs" or "gun-battles".

Abbas Faiz, Amnesty International’s Bangladesh researcher, said:

“Suggestions that these deaths in custody are just unrelated random incidents, as opposed to targeted executions, are simply not credible. The chances of this same fate befalling so many apprehended individuals defies belief and contradicts eye-witness testimony. These deaths amount to extrajudicial executions.”

“The deaths must stop now, and the responsible personnel must be brought to justice without delay,” Abbas Faiz said.

Comments and announcements from Bangladeshi government authorities over recent days have demonstrated a hostile defiance in response to national and international calls to address the claims.

The Bangladeshi Home Minister, Shara Khatun, yesterday denied that extra-judicial executions have ever taken place in Bangladesh during the time of the present government and today went on to accuse human rights organisations of "siding with the criminals"

Recently Wikileaks sources alleged that UK police have been training the RAB in Bangaldesh.

Abbas Faiz, added: “Any country that knowingly trains a force, which systematically violates human rights, might itself bear some responsibility for those violations. “

Public Document
****************************************
For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566 or email: press@amnesty.org
International Secretariat, Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW, UK

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

* News * World news * Bangladesh Bangladesh 'death squad' trained by UK police resumes extrajudicial killing -Guardian UK

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/26/bangladesh-death-squad-killings-britain
Ian Cobain
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 26 January

A Bangladeshi paramilitary unit that receives training from British police has resumed killing people in so-called "crossfire" incidents that human rights groups say are extrajudicial killings.

The Rapid Action Battalion (RAB) – condemned by human rights group as a "death squad" – ceased the killings briefly after the existence of the British training programme was disclosed in US diplomatic cables posted on the internet by WikiLeaks last month.

However, the unit announced on 12 January that it had killed a 32-year-old man in Dhaka and since then has shot dead three more men in the capital.

According to a report published this month by the Bangladeshi rights group Ain O Salish Kendra, 133 people died in extrajudicial killings in Bangladesh last year; RAB officers were said to be responsible for the overwhelming majority.

Another human rights group, Odhikar, put the figure at 127 and said that 74 died in operations involving RAB. Around 18 of those who died were said to be communist party activists.

Human Rights Watch, the New York-based NGO, has described RAB as a Bangladeshi government death squad, pointing out that senior political figures have expressed support publicly and privately for its policy of extrajudicial killings. The group has called for the UK to withdraw its support.

The leaked diplomatic cables showed that Washington is prevented by law from offering support to RAB because of its human rights abuses. RAB has admitted killing more than 600 people since its inception in 2004. Its use of torture has been documented by the UK government as well as human rights groups.

The British government does not face the same legal restraints as the US government and began offering training in late 2007, around the time that UK intelligence agencies were seeking closer counterterrorism co-operation with RAB and with Bangladeshi intelligence agencies.

Small teams of British police from forces such as West Mercia and Humberside have travelled to Bangladesh under the auspices of the National Police Improvement Agency. The leaked cables show that they offered training in "investigative interviewing techniques and rules of engagement".

Asked whether it believed it was appropriate for British officers to be training members of an organisation condemned as "a government death squad", and whether courses in investigative interviewing techniques might not render torture more effective, an NPIA spokesman said the courses had been approved by the government and by the Association of Chief Police Officers.

The Foreign Office, which funds the programme from its counterterrorism programme, said it was intended to provide "human rights and ethical policing skills training". A spokesperson said: "A decision to fund a particular project is taken only after an assessment of possible impacts and human rights implications has been completed."

Shortly after WikiLeaks posted his confidential cables on the internet, James Moriarty, US ambassador to Dhaka, said every extrajudicial killing should be investigated in a transpararent fashion by the Bangladeshi authorities.

Successive governments have promised to end RAB's use of murder. The current government promised in its manifesto that it would end all extrajudicial killings, but they have continued since its election two years ago.
In 2009 the shipping minister, Shahjahan Khan, speaking in a discussion organised by the BBC, said: "There are incidents of trials that are not possible under the laws of the land. The government will need to continue with extrajudicial killings, commonly called crossfire, until terrorist activities and extortion are uprooted."

Because RAB enjoys popular support in Bangladesh, with some sections of the population even voicing support for the extrajudicial killing of alleged criminals and terrorists, activists at Human Rights Watch and elsewhere argue that it will be disbanded only as a result of pressure from western governments.

The Bangladeshi prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, is visiting the UK, meeting political figures, and is to speak at the Oxford Union. On Monday Lord Howells, the Foreign Office minister, told the Lords that concerns about RAB were "exactly the sort of matter" that David Cameron would be raising when he met her. Meanwhile, the human rights lawyer Phil Shiner is considering mounting court proceedings to challenge the legality of the UK's support for RAB.

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Lauren Booth, Tony Blair’s sister-in-law, rejects Blair’s ‘Islam is a threat’ doctrine and becomes a Muslim

 She stresses she doesn’t believe in the Shiite-Sunni divide and says she is just a Muslim who respects all those of this faith and “wish only to pray alongside my Shiite and my Sunni brother and sisters.”

The news that Lauren Booth, Tony Blair’s sister-in-law converted to Islam, not only surprised but sent shock waves mainly through the world media.

The initial surprise was followed by a derogative campaign ridiculing her both on a personal and professional level. She was mocked for saying she had given up drinking and eating pork and for wearing a head scarf and reading the Qur’an. Jokes revolved around how she had managed to only reach Page 60!

The volume of negative reports in the press prompted her to write a response in The Guardian titled, “I am a Muslim. Why all the shock and horror”.

In a world as outlined by George W. Bush in 2001 when he said, “you are either with us or against us”, by “us” he meant the West. This “us” and “them” situation was further perpetuated through the now discredited “war on terror” and through government policies supported by mainstream media and in the process hatred and discrimination against Muslims was unofficially legitimized.

Under these conditions the fact that Lauren Booth decided to leave the “us” and join “them” made her a legitimate target for the “liberal free press”.

To convert is to make some form of a statement, as Andrew Brown wrote in The Guardian, “By becoming a Muslim, Tony Blair's sister-in-law has made a clear political statement about the society she has rejected”.

He continues: But it is also always a political and social act, a statement about where you fit into the world. To convert is to announce your allegiance to a new tribe, or a new idea of humanity.”


Booth wasn’t announcing a new allegiance. Rather it was a rejection of politicians like Blair whose belief is that “Islam is the biggest threat to world peace” and therefore needs to be confronted. For Booth it was this same belief that led Blair to mislead the nation about the weapons of mass destruction and the eventual death of over a million Iraqis.

One of the first things she did say after converting was that she hoped Blair would change his presumptions about Islam.



ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair, who went into the Iraq War backed by pro-Israel financier Lord Levy and today is working in their interests, (certainly not for the Arabs) as Middle East peace envoy, has been exposed by a family member who doesn’t back his anti-Islam rhetoric.

Booth explains: “Judging by what has been written in the so called 'liberal' press about my conversion, gives me a real flavor of just how language that ridicules and decries Muslims has become in our society. It is tasteless, often offensive and most certainly incites religious hatred.”

Booth is a columnist and features writer for Mail on Sunday; she has regularly reviewed UK newspapers on Sky News, BBC One and News 24.



The gentle softly spoken Booth joins the group continually maligned in the press as “terrorists” and “fundamentalists” knowing full well the abuse she will have to suffer due to this decision. The question is why?

Booth: “Allah has spoken to my heart and called me to Islam.”

For Booth the path to Islam “began with an awakening to the gap between what had been drip-fed to me about all Muslim life – and the reality”.

“When I arrived in the region, to work alongside charities in Gaza and the West Bank, I took with me the swagger of condescension that all white middle-class women hold toward poor Muslim women, women I presumed would be little more than black-robed blobs. After all, that's what the Muslim world is all about, that’s what we had been taught?”

After her many trips to Palestine, Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon, she began to see beyond the Western stereotypes and saw lots of women of all ages, in all manner of head coverings, educated to high levels and holding positions of power.

“My interest in Islam started after I had an awakening to the beauty of the Palestinian people in both the West Bank and especially in my home - Gaza. I felt the true kindness that exists in Arab Muslim homes and communities, where people have nothing, sometimes not even the bare essentials, but are willing to share what they have.”

She decided to become a Muslim after visiting Iran and the shrine of Fatima Al-Masumeh in the city of Qom.

"It was a Tuesday evening and I sat down at the shrine and prayed to Allah to help the Palestinians who are suffering greatly. While I sat there I felt this shot of spiritual morphine, just absolute bliss and joy”.

“I did not convert to Islam in Gaza because Allah did not call me in Gaza. Nor did I say Shahada in Iran. But Allah did make me aware of the beauty of worshipping Him whilst I was in a shrine in Iran, who can say why this was?

I converted when I returned to London and after I realized that the need to pray to Allah was increasing, not decreasing despite my distance from the Muslim world of the Middle East”.

She stresses she doesn’t believe in the Shiite-Sunni divide and says she is just a Muslim who respects all those of this faith and “wish only to pray alongside my Shiite and my Sunni brother and sisters.”

Critics aside, Booth’s conversion has left many Muslims surprised as to why she would leave her cozy Western world of acceptance and announce publicly that she is a Muslim, considering the hysteria of hatred and discrimination surrounding the faith.

“It is a duty not to walk away from a problem because it is difficult, especially where the welfare of others is concerned. I have felt for many years that the way Muslims are denounced as violent terrorists by politicians and intellectually lazy journalists is wrong and that is paving the way for more death and killing across the world. This I have and will continue to challenge in my work.

Booth is an optimist by nature. With all the negative press she received she feels the compensation is the immense love and support she is getting from Muslims around the globe.

“Today while I was shopping I was stopped and hugged by so many sisters, mostly teenagers too! It's a real sign that far from 'all being lost' as some Muslims sadly believe, that the true values of Islam faith, kindness and generosity of spirit blossom even in the harshest, most broken parts of major cities.”

“I draw strength, joy and real contentment from the thousands of messages I have received on Facebook, most of which begin in the same way. Assalum Alaykhum sister, welcome to the true, religion of peace - Islam. Anything you need, your brothers and sisters are here to help you.”

She adds with a smile: “Bismillah, with strong love like this we can work together to improve this world. Inshallah.”


Source : http://arabnews.com/opinion/columns/article208862.ece

Friday, January 21, 2011

ফেলানী হত্যা: বাংলাদেশের আনুষ্ঠানিক প্রতিবাদ

http://bdnews24.com/bangla/details.php?id=147303&cid=2

ঢাকা, জানুয়ারি ১৭ (বিডিনিউজ টোয়েন্টিফোর ডটকম)- ভারতীয় সীমান্তরক্ষী বাহিনীর (বিএসএফ) গুলিতে ১৫ বছরের কিশোরী ফেলানী হত্যার আনুষ্ঠানিক প্রতিবাদ জানিয়েছে বাংলাদেশ।

বাংলাদেশে ভারতীয় হাইকমিশনার রাজীত মিত্রকে রোববার লিখিত প্রতিবাদলিপি দেন ভারপ্রাপ্ত পররাষ্ট্র সচিব মোস্তফা কামাল।

গত ৭ জানুয়ারি কুড়িগ্রামের অনন্তপুর সীমান্তে বিএসএফের গুলিতে ১৫ বছরের কিশোরী ফেলানী মারা যায়।

ফেলানী হত্যা প্রতিরোধে ব্যর্থদের বিরুদ্ধে ব্যবস্থা নেওয়ার আদেশ চেয়ে হাইকোর্টে একটি আবেদন হয়েছে সোমবার।

ফেলানীর বাবা নাগেশ্বরী উপজেলার দক্ষিণ রামখানা ইউনিয়নের বানার ভিটা গ্রামের নুরুল ইসলাম নূরু ১০ বছর ধরে দিল্লিতে কাজ করেন। ফেলানী তার সঙ্গে সেখানেই থাকতো। দেশে বিয়ে ঠিক হওয়ায় সে বাবার সঙ্গে ফিরছিলো।

সীমান্ত পার হওয়ার সময় কাঁটাতারের বেড়ায় কাপড় আটকে গেলে ফেলানী চিৎকার শুরু করলে বিএসএফ সদস্যরা তাকে গুলি করে হত্যা করে ও লাশ নিয়ে যায় (এবং লাশটি পা উর্দ্ধমুখী করে সীমান্তের কাঁটাতারের সাথে ঝুলিয়ে রাখে)। পরদিন বাংলাদেশ রাইফেলস (বিডিআর) সদস্যদের কাছে লাশ ফেরত দেয় বিএসএফ।

রাজীত মিত্র ভারপ্রাপ্ত পররাষ্ট্র সচিবের সঙ্গে দেখা করতে গেলে তাকে প্রতিবাদলিপি দেওয়া হয়।

বাংলাদেশের আনুষ্ঠানিক প্রতিবাদলিপি ভারত সরকারের যথাযথ কর্তৃপক্ষের কাছে পৌঁছে দেওয়ার বিষয়টি আশ্বস্ত করেন ভারতীয় হাইকমিশনার। পাশাপাশি তিনি সীমান্তে এ ধরনের ঘটনার জন্য দুঃখও প্রকাশ করেন।

এর আগে রোববার আইন-শৃঙ্খলা বাহিনীর শীর্ষ পর্যায়ের এক সভা শেষে স্বরাষ্ট্রমন্ত্রী সাহারা খাতুন সাংবাদিকদের জানান, কুড়িগ্রামে বিএসএফের গুলিতে শিশু ফেলানী হত্যার বিষয়ে বাংলাদেশ-ভারত স্বরাষ্ট্র সচিব পর্যায়ের বৈঠকের শুরুতেই প্রতিবাদ জানানো হবে।

আগামী ১৯ ও ২০ জানুয়ারি ঢাকায় এ বৈঠক হওয়ার কথা।

মানবাধিকার সংগঠন অধিকারের তথ্য অনুযায়ী, গত এক বছরে ভারতীয় সীমান্তরক্ষীদের হাতে অন্তত ৭৪ জন বাংলাদেশি নাগারিক নিহত ও ৭২ জন আহত এবং ৪৩ জনকে অপহরণ হয়েছে।

বিডিনিউজ টোয়েন্টিফোর ডটকম/এসএসজেড/এএল/পিডি/১৮৫১ ঘ.